Tuesday 23rd July 2019
An extremely hot and muggy day – not the best conditions for
hacking away at brambles, nettles and 4 foot high vegetation, but we were at least
able to cool off every now and then with cold drinks inside the church.
We were pleased to have the company of Dr Toby Pillatt, who
is working on the DEBs project and came to see what our methodology was, and to
talk about our project and how it fits in with the DEBs project at the
University of York.
The processing of the RTI photos taken in the morning proved
a little problematic – but at least it proved that the software can be
temperamental – easy to use when it goes right, and you know what you are
doing, but it can fall down at the slightest error or hitch. It certainly needs
improving if it is going to be used on a large scale by community groups who
may have limited confidence with computers.
Lunch-time gave us an excellent opportunity to discuss the
technical aspects of our survey as well as funding issues, the development of
the field survey app prototype, and database.
Eileen learns how to create a detailed photographic record of a gravestone |
In the afternoon we braved the increasingly hot and stifling
outdoors to show Toby how we survey a churchyard. He joined in enthusiastically, helping to measure
up and fill in the forms, although we spent more time clearing away the weeds
and scraping off the moss to reveal inscriptions, than actually recording
memorials!
Careful excavation of a collapsed gravestone which had become completely overgrown
- final picking out of letters ready for photography
|
The undergrowth was so high and dense in some places that we
agreed several gravestones would have to wait until the autumn before they
could be recorded as they are at the moment completely hidden and inaccessible.
Besides, the wild flowers were lovely and we didn’t want to disturb it too much
since this is a haven for insects and birdlife.
We can understand that the
balance between maintenance of a churchyard to keep gravestones clear and accessible
for visiting relatives; the increasing
difficulty of financing that maintenance (which if the congregation is small
and there are few willing volunteers available, can be very expensive since
contractors have to be employed); and allowing churchyards to become nature
reserves (for which they are ideally suited), is a very difficult one – perhaps
without a real solution that is acceptable for everyone.
Jane Lunnon